California: First Appellate District Court Issues Order in Carnegie OHV Park Lawsuit

The First Appellate District Court of Appeal has issued an order that allows Carnegie
State Vehicle Recreation Area to remain open. The order reverses a challenge that attempted
to bypass the jurisdiction of the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
The Court of Appeal ruling yesterday reversed an order by the Alameda County
Superior Court in an action brought by the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (CSPA)
and the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) that sought to stop all offhighway
vehicle recreation in the park. The superior court order, if not reversed, would have
ordered the park closed until waste discharge requirements were issued by the Central Valley
Regional Water Quality Control Board.
The ruling allows for continued recreation at the park, located near Livermore, while the
Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation (OHMVR) Division of State Parks continues to work
with the Central Valley Regional Water Control Board to address water quality issues in the
area.
”We have been working for many years to ensure the park is managed in a way that
both provides for sustainable OHV recreation and prevents environmental damage. We are
pleased that the decision from the Court of Appeal will allow us to continue the work we have
been doing for many years with the Water Quality Control Board and other agencies to
properly manage the area while keeping the park open for OHV recreation”, said Daphne
Greene, Deputy Director of the state’s OHMVR program.
In its conclusion, the Court of Appeal stated that the petitioners, the California
Sportfishing Protection Alliance and the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility,
failed to exhaust available administrative remedies with appropriate agencies prior to filing their
lawsuit. The Court found that the Water Quality Control Boards have jurisdiction over the
matters complained of by the petitioners and stated that such jurisdiction may be undermined if
courts insert themselves prematurely into the regulatory process. The court stated that if and
when such procedures are exhausted, petitioners may then seek judicial action.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
News Release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Phil Jenkins (916) 324-5801
March 17, 2010

You May Also Like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.